We will hold you by the hand on Synology DiskStation 5-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (DS1512+) Its new, big, innovative, saves time and it works!
Check :
Great value on store
Featuring SuperSpeed USB 3.0. Synology DiskStation DS1512+ offers a high-performance, scalable, and full-featured network attached storage solution that meets the needs of small and medium-sized businesses that require an efficient way to centralize data protection, simplify data management, and rapidly scale storage capacity with minimal time spent on setup and management.
Many customers was gave reviews and ratings to Synology DiskStation 5-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (DS1512+). If you want to read those details to make your decision on Synology DiskStation 5-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (DS1512+). Click to see all customers reviews & ratings
Reviews By D. Thometz : Date April 3, 2012
I did a ton of research and pretty much assessed that Synology was the way to go given the alleged hardware reliability and the excellent software. I bought the 1512+ because it was the newest, fastest and best NAS to host the capacity I needed. Because it was so new it didnt have any reviews on Amazon when i bought it a couple weeks ago. I figured the "+" was a plus right?
Nah.
I got the BBOD after restarting for the first time and lost access to my three drives. Synology support is trying to help by logging into the system remotely but for one reason and another they've caused me to have another inaccessible drive. I'm pissed.
So now I sit here, beside a big black box, four shiny inaccessible disks, and an $1100 hole in my pocket.
I guess i just picked the wrong model. The 1511 seems great. I also appreciate their support crew for trying but I'm submitting an RMA or refund today. I can't trust this model until I know my data is safe on it because isn't that what we buy it for in the first place?
****************************UPDATE 05/02/12**********************************
The Synology support team had finally offered me an advanced RMA a couple days before the official announcement about the dysfunctional units. They didn't initially offer me compensation for the shipping but I was fine to just get the problem unit off my hands and pay for the shipping myself. Lucky that I procrastinated however because they sent me a UPS pre-paid shipping label 3 days after they issued the RMA. So, thanks Synology.
So I got their new unit and figured I would wait a week or so before posting. I've taxed the 1512+ pretty thoroughly over the past couple of weeks with heavy data transfer and downloads and now have 4x2TB working without a single problem. I have also restarted it multiple times without issue.
Right now I feel pretty confident that Synology has located and fixed the problem with the BBOD. So, thanks Synology.
To tell you the truth I probably wouldn't have gone with any other NAS manufacturer even after all the nonsense I went through. I knew it was simply an issue with a manufactured component that was more or less fixed in reasonable time.
Reviews By Charles C. : Date April 21, 2012
Regarding Boot Issues for select DS1512+, DS1812+ and DS212J
by Admin » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:45 am
Taipei, Taiwan--April 13, 2012--Synology® has confirmed a known system issue caused by flawed flash memory chips. This issue can occur when users reboot the DiskStation; the unit will not restart and the blue LED light will blink continuously. This issue does not affect data stored on the DiskStation and will not result in data loss.
The affected products include DS1512+ and DS1812+ worldwide, and DS212j for Asia shipments only. The best estimated quantity is 480, 120 and 700 units respectively and most of them have been returned or are on the way to Synology.
Users who encounter this issue should contact Synology at blueLED@synology.com and our technical support team will provide them with the best solution. If users did not encounter the above issue but still have any concerns, or users want to make sure the product that they are going to purchase is not affected, they are welcome to send serial numbers to blueLED@synology.com for verification.
For resellers who want to check whether their on-hand stocks are affected, they are also welcome to send serial numbers to blueLED@synology.com for verification. Synology strives to ensure all customers can receive our rapid and full support.
"We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by this issue, and appreciate your understanding in this matter. Synology has taken immediate action to correct the situation, and we remain one hundred percent dedicated to serving our customers," said Vic Hsu, CEO of Synology Inc. "Rest assured we have already identified and fixed this problem. No future shipments will be affected."
_____[...
Reviews By Gary E. Peterson : Date August 20, 2012
Here is a quote from a review at pcper.com
I'm going to let the cat out of the bag right here and now. Everyone's home RAID is likely an accident waiting to happen. If you're using regular consumer drives in a large array, there are some very simple (and likely) scenarios that can cause it to completely fail. I'm guilty of operating under this same false hope - I have an 8-drive array of 3TB WD Caviar Greens in a RAID-5. For those uninitiated, RAID-5 is where one drive worth of capacity is volunteered for use as parity data, which is distributed amongst all drives in the array. This trick allows for no data loss in the case where a single drive fails. The RAID controller can simply figure out the missing data by running the extra parity through the same formula that created it. This is called redundancy, but I propose that it's not.
Since I'm also guilty here with my huge array of WD Caviar Greens, let me also say that every few weeks I have a batch job that reads *all* data from that array. Why on earth would I need to occasionally and repeatedly read 21TB of data from something that should already be super reliable? Here's the failure scenario for what might happen to me if I didn't:
* Array starts off operating as normal, but drive 3 has a bad sector that cropped up a few months back. This has gone unnoticed because the bad sector was part of a rarely accessed file.
* During operation, drive 1 encounters a new bad sector.
* Since drive 1 is a consumer drive it goes into a retry loop, repeatedly attempting to read and correct the bad sector.
* The RAID controller exceeds its timeout threshold waiting on drive 1 and marks it offline.
* Array is now in degraded status with drive 1 marked as failed.
* User replaces drive 1. RAID controller initiates rebuild using parity data from the other drives.
* During rebuild, RAID controller encounters the bad sector on drive 3.
* Since drive 3 is a consumer drive it goes into a retry loop, repeatedly attempting to read and correct the bad sector.
* The RAID controller exceeds its timeout threshold waiting on drive 3 and marks it offline.
* Rebuild fails.
At this point the way forward varies from controller to controller, but the long and short of it is that the data is at extreme risk of loss. There are ways to get it all back (most likely without that one bad sector on drive 3), but none of them are particularly easy.
Related Products
- Seagate Barracuda 7200 3 TB 7200RPM SATA 6 Gb/s NCQ 64MB Cache 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Drive ST3000DM001
- Western Digital 3 TB Cache 3.5-Inch Internal Bare or OEM Drives WD30EFRX
- Western Digital Caviar Green 3 TB SATA III 64 MB Cache Bare/OEM Desktop Hard Drive - WD30EZRX
- Western Digital 2 TB Cache 3.5-Inch Internal Bare or OEM Drives WD20EFRX
- Kingston ValueRAM 2GB 1066MHz DDR3 Non-ECC CL7 SODIMM Single Rank x8 Notebook Memory
No comments:
Post a Comment